IGNOU| MERCANTILE LAW (ECO - 05)| SOLVED PAPER – (DEC - 2023)| (BDP)| ENGLISH MEDIUM

 

IGNOU| MERCANTILE LAW (ECO - 05)| SOLVED PAPER – (DEC - 2023)| (BDP)| ENGLISH MEDIUM

BACHELOR'S DEGREE PROGRAMME
Term-End Examination
December - 2023
ELECTIVE COURSE: COMMERCE
ECO-05
MERCANTILE LAW
Time: 2 hours
Maximum Marks: 50

 

 Note: Answer any five questions. All questions carry equal marks.


हिंदी माध्यम: यहां क्लिक करें


1. (a) “An invitation to offer is not an offer.” Comment. 4

Ans:- Within the scope of business law an invitation to offer is a different concept from an actual offer. From a legal point of view, an invitation to offer is not a binding offer, but rather serves as a preliminary step to begin negotiations. This distinction is important because it makes it clear that the party making the invitation is not bound to accept any subsequent offer. For example, when a shopkeeper displays goods with a price tag, it is an invitation to customers to make an offer, not a fixed offer.

In short, an invitation to offer sets the stage for a potential business transaction by indicating a willingness to engage in negotiations without creating a legal obligation. This principle protects parties from unknowingly entering into a contract before mutually agreeing to the terms.

(b) Explain briefly the legal rules for a valid acceptance. 6

Ans:- Here is a brief explanation of the legal rules for valid acceptance in contract law:-

For an acceptance to be valid and form a binding contract, it must satisfy the following requirements:-

(i) Acceptance must be made by the offeree to whom the offer was made. The offeror cannot assign the acceptance to any third party.

(ii) Acceptance should be complete and unconditional. It cannot add any new terms or materially change the offer ("mirror image rule"). However, under the UCC, a different acceptance from the offer is still valid without changes, becoming an offer for a new agreement.

(iii) Intimation of acceptance must be given to the proposer. Silence is generally not acceptance, unless the offeree takes advantage of the offer or the circumstances clearly indicate acceptance by silence.

(iv) The acceptance must be made within the time specified in the offer or, if no time is specified, within a reasonable time. If it takes too long for the offeror to accept, the offer expires.

(v) Acceptance should be made in the manner specified by the offeror. If no method is specified, any reasonable method of communication is valid.

(vi) If the offer is made by mail, acceptance is valid upon transmission (“Mailbox Rule”). However, revocation of the offer is effective only when received by the offeror.

In short, for a valid acceptance, the offeree must clearly agree to all the material terms of the offer, inform the offeree of the acceptance within a reasonable time and in the manner specified, and not materially alter the offer. should do. The UCC provides some exceptions to the traditional "mirror image" rule.

2. Who is a minor? Examine the legal position of minor as (a) an agent (b) a promisee (c) a partner and (d) a shareholder. 2, 8

Ans:- A minor is a person who has not attained the age of majority, which is 18 years of age in most jurisdictions.

In India, a minor is one who is under the age of 18, as defined by the Indian Majority Act of 1857. According to the Indian Contract Act of 1872, the capacity of a minor to contract depends on three factors:

(a) Age: If a person is below 18 years of age then he is considered a minor.

(b) Soundness of mind: A person is considered to be of sound mind if he can understand the contract and its effect on his interests.

The legal status of a minor in various capacities is as follows:-

(a) Minor as an agent: A minor cannot be an agent, because the agency is created by a contract between the principal and the agent. Since minors lack the capacity to contract, they cannot become agents.

(b) Minor as promisee: A minor may be a promisee in a contract, but not the promisee. If a minor has performed his promise in a contract, he can enforce the contract against the other party, even if the contract is voidable against the minor.

(c) Minor as a partner: A minor cannot be a partner, because the partnership is created by a contract between the partners. Since minors lack the capacity to contract, they cannot become partners. However, a minor may be included in the profits of the partnership with the consent of all partners.

(d) Minor as shareholder: A minor can be a shareholder in a company. However, the shares of the minor will remain with his guardian, who will exercise voting rights on behalf of the minor. The minor cannot directly exercise his rights as a shareholder until he attains majority.

In conclusion, while in most cases a minor lacks the capacity to contract, they can still be a promisor in a contract, a shareholder in the company, and share in the profits of the partnership. However, they cannot be agents, promisors or participants in a contract.

3. What is ‘quantum meruit’? Explain the circumstances when the claim for quantum meruit arises. 2, 8

Ans:- Quantum meruit is a legal claim to the defendant for payment of a fair amount for services rendered, even if there was no contract or the contract was invalid. The Latin phrase quantum meruit means "what one has earned" or "the amount one is entitled to".

A claim for quantum meruit may arise in the following circumstances:-

(i) The parties have not agreed to a contract

(ii) is a quasi-contract

(iii) The work done is beyond the scope of the original contract

(iv) The parties have not fixed any price for the services supplied

(v) There is an agreement between the parties to pay a reasonable amount for the services supplied

(vi) The contract outlines the scope of work but does not include the exact price

(vii) Customer requests work outside the contracted contract

(viii) any agreement is found to be invalid or becomes void

(ix) A party does some work or provides services without intending to do so 'for free'.

(x) There is a contract to provide services (express or implied) but there is no mention of remuneration

Quantum meruit is a separate type of remedy from a lawsuit that can be filed for breach of contract. It is an agreement to pay a fair amount for the labor and materials provided.

4. What is consideration? Explain the circumstances under which a contract without consideration is valid. 2, 8


[COMING SOON]

***


MERCANTILE LAW SOLVED PAPERS PAGE LINK - Click here


IGNOU PAGE LINK CLICK HERE

(Read Syllabus/ Assignment, Notes, Exam Routine, Question Papers and solved)


Also Read: 

1. Indian History 

2. CURRENT AFFAIRS

3. GK

4. MCQ SOLVED